Kindle-y backwards?

Brainstrobing, Geekery 10 February 2009 | 5 Comments

Anyone else find the sideview comparison of the Kindle 2 v pencil in the press frenzy mildly ironic? Kindle 2 takes outmoded physical writing apparatus? Er, FAIL.

How did Apple win on the MacBook Air envelope contrast? Context. Amazon, the cluetrain is here.

Still need to be convinced on e-reader devices. Limited titles and the loss of sensual engagement are big downers. There’s nothing like the smell of books. That and the “shake me it’s fucking shocking” price of $360 a unit. $360 for something that looks like a Milky Baresque calculator on Miracle Gro? Aside from that, I’d love to try one.

5 Responses on “Kindle-y backwards?”

  1. Don Crowley says:

    hehe! yup 360 bucks is not the way to do it. Sony’s is cheaper and pretty good I hear. It will still set you back $300. Toy’s for rich boy’s, if there are any left.

  2. Matt Mullenweg raved about his Kindle and said he read a lot more after he bought it. Then he broke it and haven’t heard anything since.. :)

  3. Matt says:

    I got another one and I still love it but haven’t had as much time to read recently.

  4. Alexia says:

    @Matt: How do you find the selection of available titles? Restrictive? Is it all Dickens and the like?

  5. Matt says:

    I rarely find a book I want that isn’t on there, except technical stuff like O’Reilly. (Which you think would be the first to embrace it.)

Leave a Reply