<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How could iStockPhoto burn up the design market?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://golez.net/2009/09/27/how-could-istockphoto-burn-up-the-design-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://golez.net/2009/09/27/how-could-istockphoto-burn-up-the-design-market/</link>
	<description>geek is good</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:10:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donncha</title>
		<link>http://golez.net/2009/09/27/how-could-istockphoto-burn-up-the-design-market/comment-page-1/#comment-3212</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://golez.net/?p=4042#comment-3212</guid>
		<description>All the micro stock photography sites survive on selling as much as they can at cheap prices. I doubt they want to get into the business of their photographers/designers actually talking to clients. Too much trouble!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the micro stock photography sites survive on selling as much as they can at cheap prices. I doubt they want to get into the business of their photographers/designers actually talking to clients. Too much trouble!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall Harbison</title>
		<link>http://golez.net/2009/09/27/how-could-istockphoto-burn-up-the-design-market/comment-page-1/#comment-3191</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall Harbison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://golez.net/?p=4042#comment-3191</guid>
		<description>Yeah have to say was wondering what the hell they were thinking when I saw this. GUess there are enough people looking to get logos on the cheap. Even 99 Designs where you pay about 150 for a logo ends up being shit. Not something that you should skimp on or get from &quot;stock&quot; IMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah have to say was wondering what the hell they were thinking when I saw this. GUess there are enough people looking to get logos on the cheap. Even 99 Designs where you pay about 150 for a logo ends up being shit. Not something that you should skimp on or get from &#8220;stock&#8221; IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

